Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Love v. Dyer et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant: Gains S. Dyer, Lynn Fitch and Ronald King
Plaintiff: William Wade Love
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Reeves et al
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant: Tate Reeves, Ronald King and Lyth Fitch
Plaintiff: William Wade Love
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Reeves et al
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant: Tate Reeves, Ronald King and Lynn Fitch
Plaintiff: William Wade Love
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. USA
as 3:2019cv00547
Petitioner: Bilal Hamid Love
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Loving v. Rushing et al
as 3:2016cv00736
Plaintiff: Marko Loving
Defendant: Unknown Rushing, Unknown Crain, Erica Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. USA
as 1:2016cv00222
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Flowers v. Tucker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00390
Plaintiff: Christina LaShaun Flowers
Defendant: Randy Tucker, Brian Watson, Unknown Rigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huaracha v. CDCR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00152
Plaintiff: Oscar Huaracha
Defendant: CDCR, CCA, Jeffey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Robinson et al
as 3:2014cv00522
Plaintiff: Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant: Laurie Robinson, Cynthia Porter, Mellisa McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. State of Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00134
Petitioner: Barry Love
Respondent: State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?