Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Little v. Pierre et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Kani C. Little
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, LaTonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Edwin F. Vargas
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thompson
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. SOLOMAN
as 5:2022cv02647
Petitioner:
SANTOS LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SOLOMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. Khox et al
as 3:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Larry Shaw, Juan Reyes, John Filer and others
Defendant:
Director, SCI-Dallas Security Administration, Superintendent Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Baltazar
as 1:2017cv01852
Petitioner:
Luis Rodriguez
Respondent:
Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2017cv02160
Petitioner:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEWALD et al v. HILLER et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. DEWALD, II, KRIS PYLANT, DAMIEN CAMMILE and others
Defendant:
MARK HILLER, DAVID BYRNE and COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2016cv06505
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON, GENE BERDANIER, KRISTEN GRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco v. USA
as 1:2016cv01280
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pedro Luis Rodriguez Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
