Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson, Maurice v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson, Jr. and Maurice M. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander, Robert v. Kaplan, Roman et al
as 3:2020cv00015
Defendant:
John W. Siebert, Lisa A. Alverez, Michael A. Lamarca and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Alexander
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris, Michael v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01033
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Emily Davidson, Mr. Broadbent and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Voss et al
as 2:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Deputy M Johnson and Richard Voss
Plaintiff:
John A Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman, Sidney et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00673
Plaintiff:
Sidney L. Coleman and Lakesha M. Johnson
Defendant:
Maggie Thomas, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Leann Moberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, David v. Dane County Jail
as 3:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Defendant:
Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bono et al
as 1:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Steven M Johnson
Defendant:
O Bono , Dr Chester and Weary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
John M Johnson
Defendant:
Edward Wall, William Pollard , Cathy Jess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cramer et al
as 2:2014cv01616
Plaintiff:
John M Johnson
Defendant:
Ron D Cramer, Correctional Healthcare Companies Inc and Dr Fatoki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, John v. Correctional Healthcare Companies et al
as 3:2014cv00506
Plaintiff:
John M. Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Fatoki, Jen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
