Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Jacks et al v. CCA et al
as 5:2024cv00062
Defendant:
Coffee Correctional Facility, Inc. et.al. and CCA doing business as Core Civil, Inc. et. al.
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthew Jacks and Jimmy Lee Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tassin v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv03754
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Petitioner:
Matthew Tassin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver and Jr. Robert Adams
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. (GDC) Legal Division et al
as 1:2024cv02334
Defendant:
Mr. Matthew Pierce, (GDC) Legal Division, Special Agent Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. McKenna
Defendant:
Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mckenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. Mckenna
Defendant:
Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Cheetwood et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Cheetwood, William Calcutt, Matthew Medert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felder v. Matthews et al
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Felder
Defendant:
David J. Matthews, Helen Felder Miller, Ray and Marrion Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
