Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Johnson v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00831
Petitioner:
Maxwell Garvice Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Maxwell, Joshua v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60480
Plaintiff:
Joshua Maxwell
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HARTSFIELD v. MAXWELL et al
as 4:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HARTSFIELD
Defendant:
MAXWELL and DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY
as 3:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MAXWELL
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. C.O. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Austin, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Campbell, Sgt. Ewing, Sgt. Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01190
Petitioner:
WAYNE MAXWELL and Wayne M. Maxwell
Respondent:
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORIN v. SJOSTROM et al
as 4:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A MORIN
Defendant:
JONATHAN SJASTROM, TONY A J SMITH, MAXWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Dippel et al
as 6:2021cv00251
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff's Office, Relaysha Mann, Sophia Maxwell and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Levon Herron, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv24097
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAXWELL v. HIGGINS et al
as 4:2020cv00463
Defendant:
JEFFERY E LEWIS, CANDICE K BROWER and BRIAN A HIGGINS
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
