Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Holmes v. Roberts et al
as 2:2016cv00747
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
Sarah Marion Roberts and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hankerson v. Warner et al
as 3:2014cv05237
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Bernie Warner, Pat Donahoe, Rob McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankerson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05182
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Bernie Warner , Robert McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Harris v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2012cv06008
Plaintiff:
Damien Harris
Defendant:
State of Washington , Rob McKenna , Bernard Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2012cv01929
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Sinclair, Rob McKenna, G. Pressell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. McKenna et al
as 3:2012cv05924
Defendant:
Robert M. McKenna , Timothy Norman Lang , Douglas W Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bukovsky v. Miller-Stout et al
as 3:2012cv05875
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Bukovsky
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Naitoko v. Uttecht et al
as 2:2012cv01411
Petitioner:
Ranae Naitoko
Respondent:
Jeffrey Uttecht and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board et al
as 3:2012cv05583
Plaintiff:
Carl A Brooks
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Christine O Gregoire, Rob McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morimoto v. Fraker et al
as 2:2012cv00981
Petitioner:
John Quinton Morimoto
Respondent:
Ron Fraker and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
