Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Botchway v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv10557
Petitioner:
Richard A Botchway
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Bruce Chadbourne and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mederos v. Murphy et al
as 1:2007cv12229
Petitioner:
Antonio Mederos
Defendant:
Robert Murphy, Michael Chertoff and U.S. Attorney General
Respondent:
Bruce Chadbourne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Enayat v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv11792
Petitioner:
Mohammad Enayat
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D Keisler and Emilio T. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguessan v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv11716
Petitioner:
Victor Kouame Nguessan
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
