Cases 1 - 10 of 752
Bazile v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bazile
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Donald Uhler, Mark Rockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinn v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Richard Quinn
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Miller, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Miller
as 6:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
Marcus Mosby
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peter Seymour, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Miller, C.O. James Schonmann, Daniel Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke, D. Goodman and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
