Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00149
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03612
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
John Warren v. State of Texas, et al
as 14-50482
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN QUINCY WARREN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, 435TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS and RICHARD WILES, Sheriff, El Paso County, Texas
Rodney Hood v. Montgomery County Texas, et al
as 14-20040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY DALE HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS, KENNETH G. DAVIS, EDSEL WEST and others
Warren v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2013cv00293
Respondent:
435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, State of Texas and Richard Wiles
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
John Quincy Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brent Fields v. Tommy Gage, et al
as 13-20306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT VONCEY FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY GAGE, Sheriff, in and for Montgomery County Texas and MAGGI CARMICHAEL, Open Record Division Management for Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Hood v. Montgomery County, Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Hood
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Texas, Kenneth G Davis, Edsel West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Walston, et al v. State Counsel for Offenders, et al
as 10-20585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN DUANE WALSTON and JERRY HANNAH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE COUNSEL FOR OFFENDERS, COUNCIL ON SEX OFFENDERS TREATMENT, CORNELL CORRECTIONS INC and others
Franklin Walston v. State Counsel for Offenders, et al
as 10-20530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY HANNAH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE COUNSEL FOR OFFENDERS, COUNCIL ON SEX OFFENDERS TREATMENT, CORNELL CORRECTIONS INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
