Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Milavec v. Maryland Correctional Institution - Jessup
as 1:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Milavec
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Institution - Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Wardens & Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01883
Petitioner:
Michael A. Alston
Respondent:
Wardens & Dept. of Corrections, Western Correctional Institution, Maryland Correctional Training Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Roberts et al
as 1:2021cv01950
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
Psychologist Z. Roberts and Maryland Correctional Institution- Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ali v. Maryland Division Of Corrections et al
as 8:2020cv02269
Plaintiff:
Seifullah A. Ali
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services, Maryland Division Of Corrections and Maryland Correctional Institution - Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simmons-Bright v. Maryland Correctional Institution-Jessup
as 8:2018cv02097
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Institution-Jessup
Plaintiff:
Dontae William Simmons-Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Davis v. Maryland Correctional Institution - Jessup, et al
as 8:2017cv03521
Plaintiff:
Vander Davis
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Institution - Jessup, Bogucki Zygmunt, Michael Gua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2010cv01520
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Wendell M. France, Maryland Parole Commissions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01488
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01306
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
