Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Fulgham v. McDonnell et al
as 2:2020cv00167
Petitioner:
Joe Lee Fulgham
Respondent:
Mark Herring, Robert F. McDonnell and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fulgham v. McDonnell et al
as 7:2020cv00184
Petitioner:
Joe Lee Fulgham
Respondent:
Mark Herring, Robert F. McDonnell and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bussie v. McDonnel et al
as 2:2015cv00089
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Robert "Bob" McDonnel, Maureen McDonnel, State of Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roulhac v. McDonnell et al
as 3:2013cv00848
Plaintiff:
Clarence Roulhac, Jr.
Defendant:
R. McDonnell, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tippens v. McDonnell et al
as 3:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert McDonnell, Harold W. Clarke and Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Virginia General Assembly et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Hassan Raashann Shabazz
Defendant:
Virginia General Assembly, George Allen, Jim Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. McDonnell et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Harris
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, Ken Cuccinelli and W. Steven Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cable v. McDonnell et al
as 2:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Brian Cable
Defendant:
Robert McDonnell, Ken Cuccenelli, Harold C. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anbessa v. McDonnell et al
as 3:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Tekur Dalga Anbessa
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, Harold Clarke and Gregory Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Ballance
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Ponton, C/O Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
