Cases 1 - 10 of 73
(HC) McGuire v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv00555
Petitioner:
Moses P. McGuire
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses P. McGuire v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv02332
Petitioner:
Moses P. McGuire
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hunter v. Bungay et al
as 2:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Bungay, Miranda, McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Philip Triefenbach v. McGuire et al
as 8:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Shawn Philip Triefenbach
Defendant:
McGuire, Williams, Unknown Deputy 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy A. Davis v. Robert Werthwein et al
as 2:2020cv10895
Respondent:
Robert Werthwein, Terry Scofidio, Terry Brown and others
Petitioner:
Jeremy A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. Paramo et al
as 3:2020cv01342
Plaintiff:
Sydney Cooper and Sidney Cooper
Defendant:
T.T. Delgado, Marcus Pollard, Daniel Paramo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Holestine v. Covello et al
as 3:2019cv01593
Defendant:
D. Coon, J. Medina, F. Armenta and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kelly Holestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henry McGuire v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv02370
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Henry McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stribling v. Fawcett et al
as 2:2018cv01925
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
J. Clough, Vance Raye, S. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv01122
Plaintiff:
John Henry Yablonsky
Defendant:
California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation, Daniel Paramo, J. Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
