Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Fitch v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray, Director Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vidal v. Garland
as 3:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Tommy Vidal
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Chad Calhoun
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Whitaker v. Cosby
as 4:2021cv00860
Petitioner:
Sean Whitaker
Respondent:
Jennifer Cosby, Director, TDCJ-CID and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
