Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Michael Fjerstad v. USA
as 11-35287
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. FJERSTAD
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fjerstad v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00567
Petitioner:
Michael B Fjerstad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael Fjerstad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-35225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. FJERSTAD
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, THERESA TALPLACIDO, Supervisory Attorney, Federal Bureau of Prisons and HARLAN PENN, Western Regional Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons Consolidated Legal Center
Fjerstad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fjerstad
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Theresa Talplacido and Harlan Penn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Fjerstad v. Scott Bach, et al
as 08-35253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. FJERSTAD
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT BACH, CITY OF SEATTLE and KING COUNTY
Michael Fjerstad v. Scott Bach, et al
as 08-35251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. FJERSTAD
Defendant:
SCOTT BACH, Seattle Police Detective and CITY OF SEATTLE
Fjerstad v. Palmquist et al
as 2:2008cv00274
Petitioner:
Michael B Fjerstad
Respondent:
Robert J. Palmquist and S. Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fjerstad v. Bach et al
as 2:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fjerstad
Defendant:
Scott Bach and City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fjerstad v. Bach et al
as 2:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fjerstad
Defendant:
Scott Bach, King County and City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fjerstad v. Bach et al
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fjerstad
Defendant:
Scott Bach, King County and City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
