Cases 1 - 10 of 23
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nelson v. Schubert et al
as 2:2023cv02553
Plaintiff:
James Denerick Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Dinah Mielke, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Oneill v. Martinez et al
as 1:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Oneill
Defendant:
L. Martinez and R. Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Egan v. Weinreb et al
as 3:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
Michael P. Egan
Respondent:
Brad A. Weinreb and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)O'Neil v. Bunch et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Michael P. O'Neil
Defendant:
A. Bunch, Escamilla, E. Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia Meza, Charles Rogers, Joseph Brannigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hollins v. Balanos
as 4:2018cv05048
Petitioner:
Michael P. Hollins
Respondent:
Sheriff Balanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierre Armand Randall Windsor-Romanov v. Michael P. Judge et al
as 2:2018cv06680
Plaintiff:
Pierre Armand Randall Windsor-Romanov
Defendant:
Mark E. Widham, Jack Keenan, Marsha Revel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael P. Williams et al v. Cervello et al
as 5:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Jerry Amason and Michael P. Williams
Defendant:
C.S.G.T. Cervello and Robert Presley Detention Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
