Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brusiter v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Darin Brusiter
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Juanito Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Long
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Gregory Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. USA
as 5:2023cv02444
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mohammed Ali v. Moore
as 5:2023cv02332
Petitioner:
Juba Mohammed Ali
Respondent:
Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Wilhite et al
as 2:2023cv03755
Plaintiff:
Gerald Fields
Defendant:
Detective Wilhite, Detective Moore, Parole Officer Gaumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shine-Johnson et al v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2023cv03233
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Richard Whitman
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Moore
as 5:2023cv00808
Petitioner:
Michael A. Payne
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Lake County Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Michael Franklin
Defendant:
Lake County Ohio, Cpt Cynthia Brooks, K. Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
