Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. United States Department of Justice
as 7:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murray v. Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail, Dep. Yardley, Dep. Lassiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Yardley et al
as 7:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
Dep. Yardley, Dep. Lassiter, Dep. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Wimer
as 7:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
Capt. Jimmy Wimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yowell v. Murray
as 7:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
John Claude Yowell
Defendant:
Lt. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Detherage v. Murray, et al
as 2:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joshua Detherage
Defendant:
Unknown, Murray, Richard Smoothermaw Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Lewis v. Murray
as 7:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrea Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melby v. Morgan et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dajade Elijah Melby
Defendant:
Sheriff Gabe Morgan, Sr., Sgt. T. Walker, Sgt. G. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
