Cases 1 - 10 of 133
MITCHELL v. WEST et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
BRANDYN MITCHELL
Defendant:
J WEST and M NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kenel Joseph
Defendant:
K. Williams, M. Neal, Derek Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nebergall v. Neal
as 9:2023cv80173
Plaintiff:
Carlton J Nebergall
Respondent:
Micha Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melbourne v. Osceola County Commissioners Board et al
as 6:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
Neal O. Melbourne and Neal Owen Melbourne
Defendant:
Osceola County Commissioners Board, Chief Holt, Manager Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. NEAL et al
as 3:2022cv16791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
NEAL, C NEELY, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry v. D'Marie et al
as 8:2022cv01809
Plaintiff:
Damon Timothy Rashaad Larry
Defendant:
Sara D'Marie, Melissa Hurley, Neal Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. SCHIOFMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C E RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. DESANTIS et al
as 3:2022cv00594
Petitioner:
EDDIE POWELL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, MARK INCH, GEO PRIVATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
