Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Fudge v. Bennett et al
as 2:2019cv01102
Defendant:
J. Olive, J. Carjal, C. Ford and others
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Lindhorst et al
as 3:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Bret Wyatt Neal
Defendant:
Dan Lindhorst, Jennifer and NORCOR County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. State of Oregon Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Bret Wyatt Neal
Defendant:
D.A.'s Office of Hood River County, Kate Brown, Carrie Resmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Panschow v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv02042
Defendant:
Mr. Wilson, Mr. Johnson and R/D Department Staff
Plaintiff:
Neal Allen Panschow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. USA
as 6:2019cv01937
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randall Neal Wynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Neal v. English et al
as 3:2019cv01381
Defendant:
Alexisa James, John Sewell, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Wyatt Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Panschow v. SHU Guard Garcia et al
as 3:2019cv00994
Defendant:
SHU Guard Garcia, SHU Guard Mosillo and Medical NP Malingkas
Plaintiff:
Neal Allen Panschow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01876
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Panshow v. USA
as 3:2016cv02309
Petitioner:
Neal Allen Panschow
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
