Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nails v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00434
Petitioner:
John Edward Nails
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harry v. Castleberry et al
as 3:2018cv01128
Defendant:
A. Castleberry and A. Weston
Plaintiff:
Nail A. Harry and Harry Nail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRY v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
NAIL A HARRY
Defendant:
M NICHOLS, L BRADY, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRY v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
NAIL A HARRY
Defendant:
M NICHOLS, S SCHWARTZ, L BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry v. State of Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv14538
Plaintiff:
Nail A. Harry
Defendant:
State of Florida Department of Corrections and State of Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harry v. Collado et al
as 1:2015cv23036
Plaintiff:
Nail A. Harry
Defendant:
Collado, Lester, Valintine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Nails v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
John E. Nails
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nails v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00264
Petitioner:
John E. Nails
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nails v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mae Emma Nails
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harry v. Wagner et al
as 2:2012cv00643
Plaintiff:
Nail A. Harry
Defendant:
A. Wagner, J. Licata, L. Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
