Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cano v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05651
Defendant:
West Facility Correctional Officer # 4, Bellevue Hospital Doctor's Escort Employee # 3, West Facility Correctional Officer # 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Nance and Christopher Hiram Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Nabozny et al
as 9:2018cv00398
Defendant:
Byers, Jeff Nabozny, Christopher Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Markel Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv02092
Plaintiff:
Darren Simmons
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Warden F. Breland, Bob Barker Manufacturer Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
Jason Perez
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Mr. F Breland, Ms Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv01986
Plaintiff:
Miguel Maldonado
Defendant:
Anothoney Annucci, F. Breland, Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv01847
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant:
Anthoney J. Annucci, F. Breland, Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. City of New York (Department of Correction) et al
as 1:2015cv07167
Plaintiff:
Levern Baldwin
Defendant:
City of New York (Department of Correction), Joseph Ponte, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Heley et al
as 1:2014cv06174
Defendant:
Director South Beach Psych Center, J. Foley, Director Peggy Heley and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Heley
as 1:2011cv01173
Respondent:
Peggy Heley
Petitioner:
Harold M Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
