Prisoner Petitions Cases
Nelson Romero v. Johnny Sausceda, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-11351
Plaintiff - Appellant: NELSON ROMERO, also known as Richard Romero
Defendant - Appellee: JOHNNY SAUSCEDA, Jail Administrator of Dawson County Jail, SERGEANT BAGBY and DAVIS
Romero v. Sausceda et al
as 2:2014cv00228
Plaintiff: Nelson Romero
Defendant: Johnny Sausceda, NFN Bagby and NFN Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson Romero v. William Stephens, Director We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-40570
Petitioner - Appellant: NELSON ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nelson Romero v. Kail, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-10500
Plaintiff - Appellant: NELSON ROMERO, also known as Ritchord Romero
Defendant - Appellee: NFN KAIL, Bus Driver, DR. NFN CHAVEZ, DR. JUDITH L. THOMAS and others
Romero v. Kail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00034
Plaintiff: Nelson Romero
Defendant: NFN Kail, NFN Chavez, Judith L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00098
Petitioner: Nelson Romero
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2013cv00052
Petitioner: Nelson Romero
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Quarterman
as 08-10015
Petitioner - Appellant: NELSON ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?