Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff: Kevas Ballance
Defendant: Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Thornton et al
as 1:2023cv02036
Plaintiff: Adam Titus
Defendant: Thornton, John/Jane Doe, Warden Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharples v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv00997
Plaintiff: Kenneth Sharples
Defendant: Sgt. Bebout, Lt. Bebout, Lt. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jeffreys et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00779
Plaintiff: William Johnson
Defendant: Rob Jeffreys, David Pfister, Amy Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05769
Plaintiff: Randy Norwood
Defendant: Thomas J. Dart, K. Johnson, Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden of Stateville 'NRC' on 5-23-13, et al
as 1:2015cv03772
Plaintiff: Jeffrey T. Jones
Defendant: Warden of Stateville 'NRC' on 5-23-13, Head of Medical Stateville 'NRC' on 5-23-13, Anthony De Mao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Judge # 23
as 3:2012cv03143
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Defendant: Judge # 23
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clasen v. Williamson et al
as 3:2009cv03319
Plaintiff: Mark Clasen
Defendant: Niel Williamson, Terry Durr, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2009cv03061
Plaintiff: Darnell M Smith
Defendant: Sangamon County Sheriff's Department, Neil Williamson and All Employees of the Records Section Working on 12/23/08
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?