Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MACDONALD v. DUDDY et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL DUDDY, JUDGE LOU ANN SUTTON, JUDGE MULHERN and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E BRADLEY
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF, PORTLAND CITY POLICE, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
TESHOME v. MAINE STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2020cv00150
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 2, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
ABIL TESHOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKER v. KNIGHTLY et al
as 2:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HOOKER
Defendant:
DEAN KNIGHTLY, JESSE BELANGER, SPENCER CHRISTIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THIABAULT v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
NORBERT THIABAULT
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGNON v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2015cv00355
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RICHARD GAGNON
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD, TROY ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOFF v. UNITED STATES PRISONER TRANSPORT INC et al
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R SCHOFF, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PRISONER TRANSPORT INC, RIVERA and UNKNOWN TRANSPORT OFFICER 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTE et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRIAN COTE
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIDI v. JUSTICE, US DEPT OF et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
JUSTICE, US DEPT OF, US ATTORNEY EXECUTIVE OFFICE, THOMAS E DELAHANTY, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
