Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 1:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warr v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2018cv00579
Petitioner:
Lydia Warr
Respondent:
James O'Neill and Steven Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Basile v. New York City, NY et al
as 1:2017cv09060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Basile
Defendant:
New York City, NY, James P. O'Neill, Matthew Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacquie v. New York City et al
as 1:2017cv05390
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Bacquie
Defendant:
NYPD Hwy Officer Mitchell, New York City, Police Officer Genine O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Reyes v. Parker et al
as 6:2017cv06546
Plaintiff:
Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Defendant:
Parker, Fossil, O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04703
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1-3 and James P. O'Neill
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Morgan
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kotler v. Bosco et al
as 1:2017cv04954
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kotler
Defendant:
Robert Cunningham, William Connolly, John Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casanova v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Casanova
Defendant:
Maldonado, Flack, O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Scott et al
as 1:2016cv08814
Plaintiff:
Cleon Taylor
Defendant:
Scott, Hayden, Rosier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quezada v. Koenigsman, et al
as 1:2016cv00705
Defendant:
Joseph F. Bellnier, Carl J. Koenigsman, John Colvin and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
