Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Lucero et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Aireyon Pero, Bradley Harris, Desiderio Garcia and others
Defendant:
FNU Lucero, FNU LNU, Summit Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. LNU et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Efren G. Ortega
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Cordova, FNU Gurrele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ontiveros v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ontiveros
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, Michael Anchondo, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ornelas-Ortega v. USA
as 5:2021cv01198
Petitioner:
Sergio Alberto Ornelas-Ortega
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 2:2021cv00985
Plaintiff:
Davis Eddie Wilson
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque, Frank Flores, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortega v. Edgman et al
as 1:2021cv00728
Plaintiff:
Max Ortega III
Defendant:
William Edgman, Louise Lopez, New Mexico Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortega v. Price et al
as 2:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Jorge Jesus Aco Ortega
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director Matthew T. Albence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortega v. Santistevan, et al.
as 2:2020cv00506
Petitioner:
Sonny Ortega Nieves
Respondent:
Dwayne Santistevan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoogerhuis v. Birnbaum et al
as 2:2020cv00435
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, FNU Birnbaum, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hoogerhuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
