Cases 1 - 10 of 14
O'QUINN v. VICE et al
as 4:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M O'QUINN
Defendant:
VICE, N OLDS, GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AITKEN v. CHUNN et al
as 4:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
STEVEN AITKEN
Defendant:
JESSICA CHUNN, OLDS, HEWETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
PAULCIN v. CHUNN et al
as 4:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
J CHUNN, V HUGGINS, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. ALLEN et al
as 4:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LOCKETT
Defendant:
P ALLEN, CANNON, M MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENDOZA v. ALLEN et al
as 4:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Defendant:
P ALLEN, W RUMMEL, A T PRIDGEON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEOHANE v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00559
Defendant:
J COKER, TODD, FDOC GENDER DISPOSITION REVIEW TEAM and others
Plaintiff:
REIYN J KEOHANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. JACOBS et al
as 4:2020cv00096
Defendant:
J COKER, MARK INCH, K A MARCHANT and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEYMORE v. CHUNN et al
as 4:2020cv00060
Defendant:
J COKER, MARK INCH, T R NOLES and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD SEYMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARCLAY v. CHUNN et al
as 4:2020cv00061
Defendant:
J COKER, MARK INCH, K A MARCHANT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES W BARCLAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
