Cases 1 - 10 of 57
James Sams v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-15643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Office Services Supervisor I, W. HAWKINGS, Correctional Captain and others
Daniel Frazer v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv02117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frazer
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
Ismael Villarreal
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv00281
Respondent:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Mr. Allen and others
Petitioner:
Javier E. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benny Carranza v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Garcia v. Ralph Diaz
as 5:2020cv02564
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Rubio v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02541
Respondent:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Messerli and others
Petitioner:
Ricardo Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin Saenz v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02542
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Mr. Allen and others
Respondent:
Wright, --
Plaintiff:
Austin Saenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Perez v. Ralph Diaz, et al.
as 5:2020cv02508
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Perez and Anthony Alfred Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
