Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baldwin v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Solorzano, Aaron Sheehan, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Solorzano, Aaron Sheehan, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cooper
Defendant:
S. Bowden, FNU Pecina, DeSoto Correctional Institution Annex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv02611
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Smith
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00648
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeen Jahmal Naseer Shabazz
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections , J. Sanchez , L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv02140
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeen Jahmal Naseer Shabazz
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Sanchez, L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Jackson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Julie L. Jones, Johnny Frambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Murphy
as 8:2016cv02169
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv02109
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Murphy
as 8:2016cv01976
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
