Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Patrick McPherron v. Thomas Hogan, et al
as 16-4101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS HOGAN, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and others
MCPHERRON v. HOGAN
as 2:2015cv05379
Petitioner:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Respondent:
THOMAS HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick McPherron v. Tobin, et al
as 15-2167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBIN, SUPERVISOR WOODSTOCK ILLINOIS PROBATION, SCHIEBO and others
Patrick McPherron v. District Attorney Chester Coun, et al
as 15-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Patrick McPherron v. Dist Attorney Chester County, et al
as 14-4336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Patrick McPherron v. District Attorney Chester Coun, et al
as 14-1692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Patrick McPherron v. Thomas Hogan, et al
as 13-2184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY
MCPHERRON v. CARROLL
as 2:2012cv00589
Petitioner:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER COUNTY, THOMAS HOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick McPherron v. Phillip Dailing, et al
as 11-1196
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP DAILING, JOSEPH W. CARROLL and CHRISTOPHER MURPHY
McPherron v. Dailing et al
as 3:2011cv50011
Petitioner:
Patrick S. McPherron
Respondent:
Phillip Dailing, Joseph W. Carroll and Christopher Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
