Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Sharpstene v. Bar-Larock et al
as 9:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Dylan Rhode Sharpstene
Defendant:
Brandi Bar-Larock, Peggy Harper, Sean O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpstene v. Burcume et al
as 9:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Dylan R. Sharpstene
Defendant:
Jeffrey Burcume, Natalie Hartle, Peggy Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Bigswarfe et al
as 9:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Keith Rodriguez
Defendant:
Brook J. Bigswarfe, Thomas Armstrong, Peggy Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernsey v. Harper et al
as 9:2020cv00992
Defendant:
Diane Tourn, Kim Richards and Peggy Harper
Plaintiff:
Michael Vernsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterkin v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Peterkin, Sr.
Defendant:
Colleen O'Neil, Anthony Annucci and Peggy Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Sawyer et al
as 9:2015cv00591
Plaintiff:
Gregory Warren
Defendant:
Cathy J. Sawyer, Jill House, Tracy Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Heley et al
as 1:2014cv06174
Defendant:
Director South Beach Psych Center, J. Foley, Director Peggy Heley and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv06812
Plaintiff:
Tarrence Konard Ash
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan and Peggi Healy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Peggy Healy et al
as 1:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Peggy Healy, Eric Monroe, Joseph Malfatone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mostafa v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07413
Plaintiff:
Omran L. Mostafa
Defendant:
City of New York, Patient Account Manager, Jose Segura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
