Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Perkins v. Steen et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason Perkins
Defendant:
Daniel Steen, FNU Peyan, Erin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Officer Ortiz
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lewis Earl Perkins
Defendant:
Officer Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong et al v. Sheriff of Ellis County et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Armstrong, Richard Johnson, Lazaro Contreras and others
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County, Ellis County Sheriff Office, Ellis County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Perkins et al
as 4:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Patrick D Moreno
Defendant:
Thomas J Perkins, Tulon Murphy, Jr, Jeff Vajdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Stephens et al
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Archie Perkins
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Shawnburger and FNU Guillory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00197
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Perkins et al
as 4:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
Ivory Johnson
Defendant:
Clinton W. Perkins and Arresting Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Townsend et al
as 4:2021cv03962
Plaintiff:
Milton Keith Perkins
Defendant:
Lonnie Townsend, Dr. Edgar Hulipas, Mrs. L. Martha Beck N.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delk v. Perkins et al
as 1:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Darnell Delk
Defendant:
Robert Perkins, John Doe, Chantal Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Detective Failed to Provide Name et al
as 4:2021cv02745
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Johnson
Defendant:
Detective Failed to Provide Name, Lance Hamm, Sergant Clinton W Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
