Cases 1 - 10 of 14
STANLEY v. WHITENTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GAMAR STANLEY
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT, WARDEN SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Wood
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tyler Prather
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tyler J. Prather
Defendant:
CCSO Officer 341 Smith, Officer Izzo, Captain Hems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Woodie et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lee Prather
Defendant:
Troup County Sheriff's Office Administration and Angela Woodie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
COCHRAN v. CHAPMAN et al
as 2:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK BERNARD COCHRAN
Defendant:
SUSAN CHAPMAN, DAVID PRATHER and Randy Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN v. CHAPMAN et al
as 5:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK BERNARD COCHRAN
Defendant:
SUSAN CHAPMAN, DAVID PRATHER and RANDY SHIRLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Angela Fischer and James Fischer
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia for Georgia Correctional Healthcare , Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Prather v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00171
Petitioner:
Johnny Isaiah Prather
Respondent:
Glen Johnson and Homer Bryson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Prather v. Gramiak et al
as 3:2014cv00034
Petitioner:
Johnny Isaiah Prather
Respondent:
Tom Gramiak and GA Pardon and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
