Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Rishard Amadi Salaam et al v. Glen E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01568
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley, Fernando Franco, R. Rusow and others
Plaintiff:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam v. Glenn E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01905
Defendant:
Fernando Franco, R. Rusow, J. Thorpe and others
Plaintiff:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaiah Giaze v. Glenn E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01835
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Glaze
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR Jeff Macomber and Warden Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2024cv07306
Petitioner:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Respondent:
Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Miyamoto et al
as 5:2024cv04342
Defendant:
Collins, Dr. Lisa Pratt, Kevin Paulson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Defendant:
Ian Albert, Lt. Rold, City and County of San Francisco and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses Clark v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2024cv06230
Respondent:
Glen E. Pratt
Petitioner:
Moses Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Wong et al
as 5:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker
Defendant:
Deputy Wong, Deputy Normaly Wortes, Dr. Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Perez-Robles v. Pratt
as 2:2023cv03044
Petitioner:
Fermin Perez-Robles
Respondent:
Glen Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
