Cases 1 - 10 of 99
(PC) Palmer v. Delgado et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Johnny Curtis Palmer
Defendant:
S. Delgado, C. Huerta-Silva, H. On and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Via Path Communication et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Via Path Communication, CDCR Office of Grievances, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. San Francisco Jail Sheriff
as 4:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
James Dion Palmer
Respondent:
San Francisco Jail Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Palmer v. Peralta et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Johnny Curtis Palmer
Defendant:
Peralta, Escamilla, Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Governor of California et al
as 5:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Governor of California, Director of Behavior Health and Disability Services and San Francisco Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Robert Claudio
Defendant:
PIA Industries Inc., Bierbaum, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Palmer
as 3:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Wesley Randle
Defendant:
M. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Palmer v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Marlon Palmer
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Palmer v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Marlon Palmer
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Allison et al
as 3:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Williams
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Gavin Newsom, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
