Cases 1 - 10 of 264
Wells v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
William Edward Wells, III
Defendant:
John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Palmer et al
as 8:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ulysses Lawrence
Defendant:
Chris Palmer and Brian Patrick Shriver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Manning et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
John Manning, Lee, Angela Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Bartlett et al
as 8:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Danquez Atkinson
Defendant:
Bruce L. Bartlett, Detective Kevin Palmer, Officer David A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Ron DeSantis, Jeffrey R. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyre et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C.A. Tyre, J. Beighley, B. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
