Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Michael R. Spengler v. Dr. Federick D. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Defendant:
Dr. Frederick D. Williams, Ms. Zuniga, RN. Himaya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Hammler v. Zydus Pharmacy et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Defendant:
M. A. Martinez, Brian Elledge, Raphael Barba and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Sabino Quair III v. CDCR CSP CIM Warden et al
as 5:2019cv00878
Petitioner:
David S Quair, III and Diva Moonchild Quair
Respondent:
CDCR CSP CIM Warden, Law Library, Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael R. Spengler v. T.T.C.F. Pharmacy et al
as 2:2019cv02553
Defendant:
T.T.C.F. Pharmacy, T.T.C.F. Medical Administration, T.T.C.F. Dietician and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02451
Plaintiff:
Felicitas Dominguez
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. CDCR, et al.
as 2:2013cv00795
Plaintiff:
Bob Savage
Defendant:
CDCR, V. Singh, Matt Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Fairfield Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv03041
Plaintiff:
Andre Lavont McDaniel
Defendant:
Fairfield Police Department and CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dollar
as 3:2011cv03103
Plaintiff:
Dale Dollar
Defendant:
Chino Institution for Men Medical, Chuckwalla Medical and C.T.F. Medical, Dental, Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Enenoh, et al.
as 1:2011cv00912
Plaintiff:
Ken Burke
Defendant:
A. Enenoh, SATF Corcoran CA State Prison and Pharmacy and Health Care System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Brown et al
as 1:2010cv02410
Plaintiff:
Kane Campbell
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, CDC Corcoran Pharmacy and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
