Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Merchant v. Philips et al
as 7:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bobby Merchant
Defendant:
Officer C. Philips and Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harless v. BRRJA-ACADC et al
as 7:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Harless
Defendant:
BRRJA-ACADC, Major Moore and Officer Coles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. USA
as 4:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
Philip Thomas Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perry v. Philips
as 7:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony Perry
Defendant:
Investigator Philips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Harry W. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Miller, Assistant Warden Oates, Captain Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merchant v. Philips et al
as 7:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bobby Merchant
Defendant:
Officer C. Philips, Warden J.C. Steeval and Mr. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Henderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Terrence Darrelle Henderson
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Rigional Operations Chief, Rigional Adimin. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Philips et al
as 7:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony Perry
Defendant:
Investigator Philips, Office Lily, Officer Betinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Boyd, Unit Manager Larry Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
