Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Drake v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Drake
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Brady Pike, Erick Durrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Nimms et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Drake
Defendant:
Wesley Grizzards Nimms, Chandler Chief Zimmermans, Bobby Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
QUARTEZ THOMAS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Sergeant CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Troup County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Troup County Jail, Sheriff James Woodruff and Captain Marty Reeves
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Dekmar et al
as 1:2018cv04072
Defendant:
Erik Vaughn, Brady Pike, William L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Dekmar et al
as 3:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Erik Vaughn, Brady Pike, William L. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIKE v. Probation Officers of State of Georgia
as 4:2017cv00210
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN A PIKE
Respondent:
PROBATION OFFICERS OF STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Motes v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Grady Lee Motes
Defendant:
State of Missouri, County of Pike and County of Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellison v. Pike
as 3:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Ellison
Defendant:
Andrew Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pike v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Johnny P Pike
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, N W Chism, Ikechukwu Akuawanne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
