Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ramiscal v. Esquetini et al
as 5:2015cv00121
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Health Services and P A Esquetini
Plaintiff:
Vincente C Ramiscal
Wilkins v. Swafford et al
as 5:2014cv03330
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Mildred Swafford, Jenifer Chaffin, Brian Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2014cv03123
Plaintiff:
Leon L. Meyers
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Birdsong, Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. California Prison Health Service, et al.
as 2:2013cv00963
Plaintiff:
Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
California Prison Health Service, R. L. Andreasen, Nathanial K. Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2012cv06266
Plaintiff:
Leon Lee Meyers
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Gregory Ahern and Prison Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felder v. Ahern et al
as 3:2011cv04830
Plaintiff:
John Mark Felder
Defendant:
Ahern, Alameda County, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Ahern et al
as 3:2011cv04303
Plaintiff:
Ron L. Marks
Defendant:
Richard Ahern and Prison Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tennison-v-Minix et.al.
as 4:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
James Freeman Tennison
Defendant:
Joe Minix and Prison Health Services, Alameda Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Singleton et al
as 5:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
Duane A. Singleton
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Prison Health Services, Alameda Co. Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Prison Health Services et al
as 5:2010cv04166
Plaintiff:
Claud M. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Harold Orr and Mechelle J. Verselles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
