Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guyton v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tyreese Guyton
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Russ Olmstead, Ryan Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kayla et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
TreVonn Johnson
Defendant:
Kayla and S Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilderness v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Wilderness and Lavonte A Wilderness
Defendant:
Grams, Ron Neal, L Haskell and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ-RAMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02139
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
IRENE VASQUEZ-RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bray v. St Joe County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00643
Defendant:
Goanz, A Finn, Anthony and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENNA v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00178
Defendant:
JANE DOE, ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., MIKE BRANHAM and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MENNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Tobias et al
as 3:2017cv00959
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Deputy Tobias and Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS-FERNANDEZ v. SMITH
as 2:2016cv00102
Petitioner:
JAYSON IVAN RAMOS-FERNANDEZ
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
