Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ramos v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Brian J. Ramos
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beckwith v. Mason et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Dep. Mason, Dep. D. Jung, Dep. Babock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Castro-Ramos
as 3:2021cv01132
Plaintiff:
Akeem Nijee Oliver
Defendant:
H. Castro-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Plaintiff:
Valentine Pasci, Raul Marquez, Mark Wicklund and others
Defendant:
Kurtiss Morrison, Steven Alexander, Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ramos v. Ramos
as 3:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Ramon Francisco Ramos
Plaintiff:
Tesla Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Johannesen
as 3:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Jullian Carroll, Thomas M. Ryan, Espana and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Multnomah County Inverness Jail
Plaintiff:
Colby Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. State of Oregon
as 3:2018cv00339
Petitioner:
Colby Ramos
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01628
Defendant:
Amy Atchison, Lt. Bael, Officer Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Ramos and Ramon Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01472
Defendant:
And other to be named at a later time., Amy Atchison, Lt. Bael and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin and Ramon Ramos
OSCI:
Officer Box
BHS:
Ms. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
