Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Green v. Sirmons, et al
as 15-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, OSP, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, Unit ManagerOSP, A. LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden-OSP and others
Green v. Sirmons, et al
as 14-7024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, OSP, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, Unit ManagerOSP, A. LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden-OSP and others
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 13-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
Muhammad v. Workman, et al
as 12-7080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AB'DULLAH LAMAR RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, TERRY CRENSHAW, Assistant Warden and BOB COMPTON, Food Service Supervisor
Allen v. Workman
as 12-6253
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARRY THOMAS ALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Hooper v. Jones, et al
as 12-6202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden and DOES, Unknown Executioners
Muhammad v. Workman, et al
as 12-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AB'DULLAH LAMAR RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, TERRY CRENSHAW, Assistant Warden and BOB COMPTON, Food Service Supervisor
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 12-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
Knox v. Workman, et al
as 12-6101
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, JANA MORGAN, CMHC and ROBERT POWITSKY
Allen v. Workman
as 12-6094
Petitioner - Appellee:
GARRY THOMAS ALLEN
Respondent - Appellant:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
