Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Szentkiralyi v. Aviles et al
as 1:2017cv00949
Petitioner:
Krisztina R. Szentkiralyi
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles, Raymond Simonse, Jeh Johnson and others
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nick Mends v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 10-10796
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICK MENDS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, RAYMOND SIMONSE and others
Enobong v. Sizer et al
as 1:2009cv01429
Petitioner:
Ebong Enobong
Respondent:
Frank Sizer, Frank Sizer, Janate Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Mends v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2009cv00333
Petitioner:
Nick Mends
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jean-Baptiste v. Sizer et al
as 1:2009cv00438
Petitioner:
Eduard Jean-Baptiste
Respondent:
Frank Sizer, Raymond Simonse, Wayne K. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osueke v. Hassell et al
as 2:2009cv00254
Petitioner:
Kelechukwu Osueke
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Raymond Simonse and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Malak v. Napolitano et al
as 4:2009cv00181
Petitioner:
Rebhy Youssif Abdel Malak
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Raymond Simonse and Scott Hassell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mends v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2009cv00259
Petitioner:
Nick Mends
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gustave v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00041
Petitioner:
Patrick Gustave
Respondent:
United States of America, Frank Sizer, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
