Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Krow
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Richard Yates
Respondent:
Ivan Krow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Daron Darnell Bell
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, Richard Boling, Eric Pacheo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. USA
as 2:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Richard R. Crawford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lee v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Herbert Eugene Lee, III
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Joshua Pickering, Nicholas Hollkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
James R. Patton
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Karen Ramey, Rick Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Basey v. USA
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Lee Basey
Defendant:
USA, Ralph R Beistline, Richard Paez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Crall et al
as 0:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams
Defendant:
Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillie-Toler v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Richard William Tillie-Toler
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
