Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ricks v. Foxwell, Warden of ECI et al
as 1:2019cv00056
Plaintiff:
Bruce Antonio Ricks
Defendant:
Robert Troxell, CDM and Ricky Foxwell, Warden of ECI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lee v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2018cv03882
Defendant:
Robert Troxwell, CDM and Ricky Foxwell
Plaintiff:
Tracy Samuel Lee
Consolidated Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Bruce Antonio Ricks and Mervyn Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Matthis v. Somerset County Detention Center et al
as 1:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raymond Warren Mathis
Defendant:
Somerset County Detention Center, Hickman, Rick Kato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gopshes v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2017cv02324
Petitioner:
Cokie Joe Gopshes, Jr.
Respondent:
Rick Foxwell and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aurel v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Barrera Robustiano, Ashboob Asraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Barrera Robustiano, Ashboob Asraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2016cv01272
Plaintiff:
Dino D Brown
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Lawrence J Hogan, Jr, Frederick County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gebhart v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv00708
Petitioner:
Jeremy A. Gebhart
Respondent:
Rick Miller and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tunstall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2015cv01580
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tunstall
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, George C. Edwards, Joseph M Getty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricks v. USA - 2255
as 1:2013cv02626
Petitioner:
Andrel Ricks
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
