Cases 1 - 10 of 321
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Quantovia Robinson
Defendant:
Counselor Smith, Officer Carver, Counselor Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Uhaul Company et al
as 4:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Uhaul Company, City of Savannah Police Dept., Sheriff John Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 7:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
QUANTOVIA ROBINSON
Defendant:
Warden SMITH, CARVER, Warden COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Robinson v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv04159
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Alzafas A. Nance
Defendant:
Terry Langley, Brad Robinson, Captain Shane Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braswell v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
William Larry Braswell, III
Defendant:
Terry Langley, David Jordan, Shane Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al
as 5:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Quantovia Robinson
Defendant:
Mr. Odum, Ms. Jones, Mr. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al
as 7:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
QUANTOVIA ROBINSON
Defendant:
Warden ODUM, Warden JONES, Warden COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
