Cases 1 - 10 of 302
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Bixler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Whatley v. Lape et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Whatley and Pairi Omari Will El Rey
Defendant:
Kathleen Lape, Douglas Ullrich, Dennis Alerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Ray Hargis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rice, II, Peewee and Dayton Ray Rice, II
Defendant:
Jaime Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyer v. Ray
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Boyer
Defendant:
Shawnee Ray and Kenton County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ray v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
