Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SUITE v. WARDEN KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv00354
Petitioner:
RAWLE GERARD SUITE
Respondent:
WARDEN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAWLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
GREGORY M. RAWLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
RAWLS v. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
as 1:2016cv06691
Plaintiff:
LE'NORMANDY RAWLS, SR.
Defendant:
BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
FLEMMING et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv03533
Plaintiff:
EON FLEMMING
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT , M. RAWLING and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
COUNTY OF UNION
Thirdparty_defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY
Cross_claimant:
COUNTY OF UNION
Cross_defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. RAWLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLING v. MANSFIELD TWP MUNICIPAL
as 1:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
GARY RAWLING
Defendant:
MANSFIELD TWP MUNICIPAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLINGS v. HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT
as 3:2010cv04626
Plaintiff:
GARY RAWLINGS
Defendant:
HAMILTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAY v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2010cv02346
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MCCRAY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, RAWLS, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLINGS v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 3:2009cv05586
Plaintiff:
GARY RAWLINGS
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
