Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Gregory Smith v. M. Roennmann, et al
as 18-15238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROENNMANN, Correctional Officer at S.V.S.P., M. MEJAI, Correctional Officer at S.V.S.P., A. MIRAMONTES, Correctional Officer at S.V.S.P. and others
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Pratt v. Kernan et al
as 5:2017cv04375
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Pratt
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, K. Kumar, Lawrence S. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Indiveri v. Mack
as 5:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
John A. Indiveri
Defendant:
Richard Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 5:2016cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
R. Machuca, Jr., M. Zornes, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Mack
as 3:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean
Defendant:
Richard Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2014cv05508
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Coleman
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffrey Beard, Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur v. Brown et al
as 5:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Arthur
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Mathew Cate, R. T. C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 4:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, L. Trexler, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Treadway v. Malo-Clines et al
as 3:2012cv04039
Plaintiff:
John L. Treadway
Defendant:
Cheryl Malo-Clines, Edgar Clark, J. Boadoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
